Hashtag trend robs artists' powerful lyricism: Hip-Hop Weekly

Posted by Jenna Postler

Do you ever struggle to make comparisons in your speech and accidentally leave the ‘like,' or ‘as' out of your metaphors and similes?

Let's say you're trying to explain that something is expensive. Would you say, "prices steep…stairs?" You probably wouldn't. It just doesn't sound right.

Although in colloquial English, this might sound strange, as of late, it has become quite common in hip-hop.

This phenomenon of leaving out the crucial "like" or "as" from a simile or metaphor has a term within the hip-hop community: hashtag rap.

During a Nov. 2 interview with Funkmaster Flex on the radio station Hot 97, rapper Kanye West claimed to have started the fad.

West proposed that hashtag rap spawned from his 2007 song, "Barry Bonds."

On the chorus of the track, West raps, "Here's another hit…Barry Bonds," leaving out a connecting word between the noun and the baseball player.

While West claims to have started this style, examples of hashtag rap can be traced as far back as 2002.

Whether its true conception came from West's "Barry Bonds" or a previous song, hashtag rap has really taken off with the rise of popular rappers like Drake and Nicki Minaj.

Examples of hashtag rap in popular music include, "Swimmin' in the money, come and find me…Nemo," and "Hang it up…Flatscreen," rapped by Drake and Minaj, respectively.

Despite the varying opinions on these immensely popular artists, many agree that this style of rapping does nothing to further the genre.

Instead of becoming progressively more complex and talent-filled, the fad of hashtag rap robs artists' lyrics of their potential. By removing words from metaphors, hip-hop artists are making themselves look and sound ridiculous.

Essentially, hashtag rap serves only to dumb down the genre, discrediting rap as a form of expression.

The hashtag trend is quickly turning a genre once known for its powerful lyricism into a simple stream of words.

One can only hope that the fad of hashtag rap is only that - a fad – and not a permanently disfiguring presence within hip-hop that will leave ‘em scarred…leprosy.

Jenna Postler is a sophomore from rural Vt. who knows what's hip (hop) and can be heard from 2- 4 a.m. every Friday mornng on WSPN.

Sports Wrap: Men's basketball heads to 'Big Dance'

Posted by Julia Schwartz

Skidmore basketball returned to the Liberty League tournament for the second year in a row. They finished regulation play posting a 16-9 overall and 10-4 league record. The team tied a program record for regular season wins and set a new program record for Liberty League wins.

The tournament began with a game against Rensselaer Engineers. The Thoroughbreds and Engineers were 1-1 against one another this season with each team winning on its home court.

The Thoroughbreds struggled at the beginning of the first half, but Terron Victoria '12 threw up two three-point shots in order to start a 16-0 run after the 10:53 mark. The Engineers held the lead at the end of the first half, with a score of 38-34. Within the first half there were 11 lead changes, a remarkable amount matched by the competitive nature of the rivalry of the two teams.

When the second tip off began, Skidmore aggressed toward the opponents basket, scoring the first 9 points of the half. With the five-point lead from their expedient start, Skidmore kept pushing and never gave up the lead for the rest of the game. Every time the Engineers would attempt to push ahead, the Thoroughbreds matched their efforts. The lead never dropped below three points.

Standouts in the game were Victoria, who led the Thoroughbreds in double figures with 17 points, followed by Gerard O'Shea ‘12 with 12 points, and Kyle Clark '12 and Melvis Langyintuo '12 both had 11 points and 9 rebounds.

Skidmore came out the next day to perform in its first Liberty League championship the following day. Riding off the win from the previous day, they swept their tournament play to prevail in the Liberty League. The win came with not only the team's first Liberty League title, but also an invitation to the NCAA tournament starting Mar. 4. at Worchester Polytechnic Institute, when Skidmore competes against Amherst.

Skidmore accelerated in the first half with 9 three-pointers, four of them coming from the hands of Langyintuo. With the team on fire, the Thoroughbreds took the lead at the end of the first half, with a score of 33-19.

The second half began when Skidmore increased their lead out to 20 points, after back-to-back three pointers from Jeff Altimar '11.

Skidmore never lost a double-digits lead as the team controlled rhythm of the game to obtain a final score of 68-52. Langyintuo led all scorers in the game with 20 points, while O'Shea added 10 points and four assists.?

Following their high performance in the Liberty League tournament, juniors Langyitnuo, O'Shea and Victoria all received the honor of Performers of the Week after their selection for Liberty League All-Tournament Team.?Langyintuo was named Tournament MVP after scoring a total of 31 points in both games and shooting 6-8 from three-point range. O'Shea scored in double figures during both Liberty League games and played without a single turnover.?Victoria led the Thoroughbreds in their game against RPI with 17 put up eight points and four assists in the championship game.?

With the win, Skidmore advanced to the final game of the tournament against Hamilton the following day. The tournament begins with three first-round games between the lowest seeded-six teams. The three first-round winners move on to play one of three number one seeds on Saturday. After dwindling down from more than 400 schools in Division III men's basketball, Skidmore begins play in one of 13 four-team groupings against number 9 seed Amherst at Worchester Polytechnic Institute Mar. 4.

Ice Hockey

After scoring a spot in the ECAC East semifinals, Skidmore lost in a shutout game against Babson Feb. 26. The Thoroughbreds end the season at 9-14-3. The game ended with six chances missed on the power play, while Babson was able to convert on two of four chances.

Two goalies swapped chances during the game to help defend, but came out with five allowed goals, from both Colin Bessey '12, who had 16 saves and Andrew Ross '12, who had 17 saves throughout the final 30:11.

Men's Lacrosse

After a change in location due to a blast from the persistent winter weather, Skidmore lacrosse came out on top with a score of 9-8 against Babson on the road. It was the season opening game for both teams. J.P. Sullivan '13 provided the first early lead for the Thoroughbreds with 5:34 left in the first quarter, to bring the score to 2-1.

During the second quarter, Babson attempted to gain the lead back, but Skidmore prevailed and ended the half with a 5-4 lead.

While the teams managed to bring the score to a tie in the third quarter, Sullivan converted an assist from Mike Holden '13 with just under 11 minutes left in play. Sullivan then scored the insurance goal, his fouth of the game, to provide Skidmore with an absolute win with 2:44 left in regulation.

Skidmore lacrosse continues to battle the cold and the snow next on Mar. 5 at home against Western Connecticut State at 3:30.

Defense is not always our best offense: Practical Race and Diversity

Posted by Danny Pforte

Two weeks ago, students and faculty met to suggest to the administration measures that would alleviate the tension on campus that has recently made students of color feel uncomfortable and even unsafe. Some suggestions included institutionalizing IGR (Intergroup Relations), reworking the First Year Experience (FYE) program with the goal of fostering more interaction between different social groups in mind and reevaluating the methods and practices of the Discovery Tour. Although the administration claimed to be interested in making changes, many of their responses to these suggestions made them seem reluctant.

When students called for FYE to take a more rigorous approach to encouraging interaction between minority students and the more privileged majority, Beau Breslin responded by asking students to give him suggestions as to how he should do so. He explained that additions to the program will result in subtraction as well. The dean of Special Programs (among other administrators) summarized what his role is in the college's mission for diversity. Mary Lou Bates defended the Discovery Tour, explaining its effectiveness in bringing a diverse student body to Skidmore's campus.

The Discovery Tour may bring more students of color to campus, but it doesn't ensure that they will be comfortable upon arrival. Simply having a more diverse student body does little to alter peoples' narrow view of those of us who are and have been marginalized because of our identities. A former student argued that interaction between student groups needs to be forced. Otherwise, our campus climate will only worsen.

Furthermore, when needs are expressed to people in a position of power, they should not be met with defensiveness. This attitude defeats the purpose of these discussions and slows the process of resolving this issue. Breslin asked for suggestions from students on how to make FYE more effective in convincing students to "check privilege at the door," but this responsibility cannot be thrown back at the group requesting change. If we are going to promote interaction between student groups, FYE would be a great place to start, since it is one of the few required programs for freshmen.

Also, the administration needs not remind us of their job. We should know their purpose from the moment we step onto campus for the first time. If there was a general consensus that the administration was doing a good job at dealing with campus climate issues regarding diversity, then a community meeting wouldn't have been necessary in the first place.

As individuals of a college community and a complex society, it is time for us to be creative. I have coined the term "action listening"?to describe something that I believe needs to be practiced if serious change is going to happen at Skidmore and in the larger society. Action listening is the opposite of the defensive and sometimes indifferent attitude that concerned students were met with at the meeting.

Action listening also means that when needs are expressed by members of the community, everyone listens and attempts to find a common opinion that will lead to productive action. Solutions go awry when the argument consists of upholding the norm, or the societal and institutional inequalities that minority students must deal with everyday of their lives. Without steps toward tangible action, the social tensions underlying our campus will remain. As Social Work professor Peter McCarthy stated at the forum, we were having these same conversations 30 years ago.

Fed up with the lack of progress, a few students stood up and voiced the personal struggles that they as students of color have faced on this campus. These struggles are real, and they are not going away without listening coupled with action. I hope that both those at the forum and those reading this feel the same way.

FAN stages 'Vagina Monologues'

Posted by Tegan O'Neill

From Feb. 25 to Feb. 27 was flooded with emotion as 11 women performing in "The Vagina Monologues" spilled their hearts and souls into their roles and spoke out about sex, masturbation, orgasm, birth and rape.

The Feminist Action Network, otherwise known as FAN, staged three performances of Eve Ensler's episodic play to raise money for the Domestic Violence and Rape Crisis Services of Saratoga County.

Of the proceeds raised, 10 percent will go to a charity chosen by the V-Day movement's Spotlight Campaign. V-Day is a global activist movement for the stopping of violence against women and girls.

This year, funds will go to the Women and Girls of Haiti to help ensure safety for women left in post-earthquake Haiti and to establish three safe houses for survivors of violence.

V-Season lasts from Feb. 1 to April 30 during which "The Vagina Monologues" is staged across the world to celebrate the female body and raise awareness about violence against women.

Eve Ensler wrote the monologues in 1994 after conducting 200 interviews with women about such topics as sex and relationships.

Ensler gives out the rights to the show with the expectations and hopes that all of the proceeds will be donated to causes serving the empower of women.

It started out as a celebration of the female body, but has since taken on a much larger role.

"It has become more of a movement than a play," said Grady Shea '13, who directed the most recent performance.

Although Ensler mandates that all those cast in the show be female, there are no stipulations about the sex of the director.

Shea was chosen by the FAN to direct the play. He noted that from this experience he has learned a great deal about himself, "as an artist, a man and a human being."

Ensler encourages both males and females to support the show. "You can be male or female to be a feminist," Shea explained.

Eliza Straim '11 and Sarah Elwell '11, co-presidents of FAN, produced the show. "I was in the show my sophomore year and I have loved it ever since," Elwell said.

The annual nature of the show makes it possible for students to attend each year and see how different women bring their own flair to the monologues.

"Older Skidmore students can see how it has changed over the years," Elwell explained.

For Straim, it was the connection between the audience and the performers that made "The Vagina Monologues" special.

"There is an incredible sense of community during the show. Everyone present is bonded in that moment," Straim said.

To heighten this sense of community, the chairs in Falstaff's were arranged in a configuration that had audience members facing each other so that they could direct their attention toward multiple spotlights throughout the show. Throughout the performance, the actresses weaved in between rows of the audience.

The effect was appropriately intimate for the issues raised by "The Vagina Monologues." The monologues are provocative and raise issues that are usually ignored or generally deemed unsuitable for everyday conversation.

Issues were varied and included social and political topics like rape in war-torn countries, the varying decibel levels of female orgasm and the ridiculousness of thong underwear.

"It is a wonderful production and an important one to put on," Shea said.

The monologues elicited emotional responses that ranged from hilarious to heart-wrenching. All were delivered with incredible passion and power.

For more information about "The Vagina Monologues" and the V-Day movement, visit www.vday.org.

Senate approves new SGA digital coordinator position

Posted by Kat Kullman

On March 1, the SGA Senate met to discuss a resolution to establish an official SGA digital coordinator.

The resolution to create an SGA digital coordinator stems from the senators' desire to make the actions and decisions of Senate more quickly publicized.

Senator Randy Abreu '11 created the resolution and suggested that becoming more involved in social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter would allow information to get to the students faster.

The digital coordinator would update these sites during the weekly Senate meetings.

"It started off from talking to people who wanted to know about what goes on in Senate, but more in real time," Abreu said. "I realized that Skidmore kids are always on their smartphones, and that this could be a way to get the information to them instantly."

Abreu cited the 100 free tickets to a recent hockey game as an example of how getting the news out faster would have been more effective.

Not many students took advantage of the opportunity for free tickets, likely because of ineffective advertisement.

The resolution was unanimously approved, thereby creating a new step-up position in the Senate body.

In other news:

• Senate approved a resolution to allocate funding from program support to the Drastic Measures. Bryce Klatsky, president of the Drastics, approached Senate to request $100 for posters to advertise the group's charity concert on March 21. The money raised from the concert will go to a charity for autistic children.

• Senate approved a resolution to allocate funding to SkidTV. Mike Forbes '12, president, and Mike Levin '11, treasurer, requested $8,000 for new video cameras that are based on flash drives, not tapes. Senate unanimously approved the request. The cameras will be available to the Skidmore community, but only after a training process.

Re-evaluate the power of the political party: Politics for the Upstate Student

Posted by Julia Grigel

Something is clearly not right: Jimmy McMillan ("The Rent is 2 Damn High" guy) is going to run for president. Better yet, he's doing it as a Republican.

In case you missed him in last fall's gubernatorial race (or the rest of the New York State elections that he's been a part of since 1993), he was the one with two curiously round tufts of silver hair for a beard, ridiculous mutton chops and black gloves that he attributes to over-exposure to Agent Orange and other chemicals in Vietnam. He ran on "The Rent is 2 Damn High" ticket (the party platform is self-explanatory) in the 2010 elections for governor of NY. Now he has his sights set higher.

Although he ran on "The Rent is 2 Damn High" ticket, McMillan was a registered Democrat. But those days are over: he will run his presidential campaign as a Republican to avoid facing Obama in a Democratic primary. Besides, "the Democratic Party sucked," said McMillan of his sudden turnaround. Hey, I at least give him props for his honesty — it's not easy to come by in politics.

He recently attended the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington, D.C., where he cozied up to Republicans and waved his shoe around in support of "our brothers and sisters in Egypt." It seems that McMillan now has a "thing" for shoes — when asked whether or not he would support gay marriage in 2010, he explained that if somebody wanted to marry a shoe, he'd support that.

Okay, so Jimmy McMillan is a funny dude. But the implication of his presence at the Conservative Political Action Conference for politics in general is that our system has become confused and downright messed up. The fact that a single-issue candidate must choose one of two political parties to represent his values speaks quite poorly of our party system.

It seems illiberal to have a system in which "popular sovereignty" refers to the right to choose between two parties. Especially when both parties are confused about what they really stand for because they are so busy trying to please the majority. A majority who — can you blame them? — don't understand what these glossy political euphemisms actually mean in the first place.

Third parties tend to get a lot of negative press because they just don't have a place in our voting system. The fact that so many people were mad at Nader for campaigning in 2000 and "stealing" the election from Gore is an insult to the tenets of democracy. A Nader ought to be able to run in every election. The two-party system simply doesn't cut it when so many people want to see a progressive agenda.

Will we ever see a multi-party democracy in the U.S.? It's doubtful. We've had two parties since before Washington warned against having two parties. It's tradition. It's what we're used to. It makes watching elections feel like watching football.

In order to change the party system we'd need to change the voting system. First, we would have to do away with the Electoral College (and as we know from our fifth grade social studies class, changing the constitution is tough). To give third parties a fighting chance, we'd also need to abandon the winner-takes-all method of voting, which goes hand in hand with a two-party system.

The grand flourish to this idealistic sequence of changes would be a switch to a runoff voting system in which voters rank candidates in order of preference, thus preventing a third party from "stealing" votes from another candidate who might otherwise win. In turn, a runoff voting system would allow for more candidates —like McMillan!

For some instructive (albeit radical) thoughts on the ills of democracies such as ours, it's often helpful to look at the villainous dictator of the day for his constructive criticism. And indeed, we can find some interesting wisdom on the problems of the party system in dear old Quaddafi's 1980 manifesto, "The Green Book."

Perhaps with some inspiration from Marx, Quaddafi informs us that "all political systems in the world today are a product of the struggle for power between the instruments of government." He goes on to say that "a party's aim is to achieve power under the pretext of carrying out its program democratically."

So here we have a power-hungry dictator telling us that a democracy's party politics are essentially a fight for power and control. We certainly don't need to read his denunciation of party-based democracy to make our own judgments. Quaddafi was obviously a little crazy back in 1980, and by now has totally gone off his rocker.

But, if nothing else, his brazen criticism of party politics serves as food for thought. And even the presence of McMillan in politics, as he pushes a fringe issue from within the Republican Party, makes us think about what our parties really stand for. The chance of seeing any significant reform is unlikely, but it's worth hoping for.

Our private college is also public: Daydreams

Posted by Rick Chrisman

I was taken by surprise at the community meeting about race the week before last, although I shouldn't have been. The highly emotional outpouring by students of color about their mistreatment and resultant misery at Skidmore was sobering for me, who believed that things were much better than that.

But then I remembered where we are: America! Most of us are Americans, having grown up in a society that faces persistent racism (though there are some exceptions). We brought this racial tension to Skidmore with us from our hometowns and, in doing so, we perpetuate this sort of society. But there's hope.

At the meeting, the calls for action were heartfelt, and promises were made to come back with good proposals for action. Yes, some people were dismayed that they had heard this conversation before at Skidmore. A Skidmore News clipping from 1994 recently posted over a water fountain read "Race Relations at Skidmore One Year Later: is it getting any better?" Apparently not, but the upside is that the conversation has been renewed.

So, we ask, who's to blame? Who is responsible for the ongoing racial hostility here? Can't more be done to prevent this unnecessary pain? We are overdue to "pop the bubble," as Danny Pforte said in his article last week.

But the bubble that I blame for our distress is not one of whiteness, privilege, affluence or ignorance alone, although these factors aren't totally irrelevant. The real problem is one of self-control. Skidmore students seem to see themselves in a "domestic bubble" — in other words, to imagine their college campus as being their big comfy living room.

The reality, of course, is that they have left home and now occupy a larger public space where the rules of communication are much stricter. Students must remember that public discourse is far more limited than private. This rule applies to both to college life and the work world.

Apparently, many students haven't adjusted to this new reality. Back in their living rooms at home, where they are accepted by everybody under that roof no matter how they behave, they are accustomed to exhaling their opinions and fulminations. And that's what private space is for. In the larger community, however, the rules of etiquette change.

Here at Skidmore, we are suddenly met with relationships that differ greatly from those we had at home. They are public relationships, friendships between strangers. Everyone you meet is a candidate for friendship; everyone in the dorm, the dining hall, on the team and in class. In joining this liberal institution, we suddenly become equal-opportunity friends motivated collectively by curiosity, empathy, a passion for learning and what I would call a kind of communal love.

Danielle S. Allen says that such friendship "is not an emotion, but a practice, a set of hard-won, complicated habits that are used to bridge trouble, difficulty and differences of personality, experience and aspiration." She calls this "the citizenship of trust-building." If this mindset were to overtake the Skidmore campus, it would eliminate everything from anonymous racial slurs to more overt harassment. But that's a big "if."

The distinction between the private and public spheres is common sense, but to many students, the boundary of the public sphere is unclear. As far as they are concerned, the discourse appropriate within the private sphere carries over indefinitely, thus invading the invisible public one. And this is how the pain begins.

During the performance after the community meeting that Friday, James Baldwin looked out at the audience and lovingly exhorted them: "Take care of each other, protect each other." It was beautifully said, and it's not that hard to do.

Dining Services food preparation gloves spur controversy

Posted by Alex Brehm

A Dining Services worker has recently expressed concern regarding boxes of food preparation gloves with a label that reads, "WARNING: These vinyl gloves contain a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer, birth defects and other reproductive harm."

Stickers from manufacturing company, Food Handlers, conceal the warning labels on these boxes. One of the stickers says, "Learn more about Food Handler's sustainable glove and bag options: www.foodhandler.com."

The dining hall worker, who declined to have his name printed, said he first noticed the stickers covering the warning labels one year ago. He said he had posted the labels and the health warnings on the Dining Hall's suggestion board twice, but got no response.

When another worker posted asking about the labels he received a response that said Dining Hall managers cared about the safety of the workers and the issue had been investigated.

A representative from Food Handler said that the warning was placed on the gloves due to the presence of DEHP, a plasticizer that is used to make glove material more flexible, and which is found in other brands, not only Food Handler.

Under the state of California's Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, the company was forced to include the warning on its packaging as long as its product contained DEHP, the representative said.

Food Handler began including "strict requirements that eliminate DEHP completely" from the gloves. The representative said that the company had extra packaging containing the warning, and covered it with a sticker instead of switching immediately to a new package design.

Managers at Dining Services were not available for comment by press time on March 3.

Benefit concert boosts donations

Posted by Jessica Strasser

On Thurs. Feb. 24, Falstaff's was filled with the sounds of goodwill.

Lively Lucy's hosted the Orphanage Outreach Benefit Concert to support a group of student volunteers who will be going on a service trip during spring break.

The group of student volunteers will be traveling to Monte Cristi, a province in the Dominican Republic.

The trip was made possible by Orphanage Outreach, an organization through which volunteers serve to educate orphaned, abandoned and disadvantaged children.

The student volunteers believe that through principles such as selflessness and ‘serving, not helping,' impact can be made not only in the lives of the children, but in all those in the community.

The service trip was organized in part by Sara Mae Hickey '12, who "had wanted to do a service trip," one of the main organizers of the concert Sarah Dinkleacker ‘14 said.

Through the International Affairs Club, Student Announcements and word of mouth, the trip brought together 19 volunteers.

The group will be going to the Hope of a Child Orphanage in Monte Cristi. Dinkelacker explained students will "go to the school and teach the kids … the importance of boiling water, washing your hands, brushing teeth and how to prevent cholera."

Cholera prevention is especially key, as Monte Cristi is near Haiti, where many are currently struggling with a large cholera outbreak.

"We don't know everything we are going to have to do at the orphanage yet. The program really emphasizes flexibility and doing whatever task is needed of you at the time," Dinkelacker said.

The concert came about as a means of fundraising. The student volunteers had a short amount of time to collect a multitude of items, including shampoo and conditioner, cold medicine, school supplies and clothing.

Holding a benefit concert at Falstaff's was "the best way to get the things we needed … and make it known what we were doing," Dinkelacker said.

Holding the concert would give the group an open forum to explain exactly what its mission was in a more interactive matter.

The benefit concert also allowed those who donated to know exactly what their money was supporting.

"I know whenever I am going to give to a charity I prefer it to be one where I know exactly what [the money] is going to," Dinkelacker said.

The concert filled Falstaff's with students who came to donate and listen to the sounds of many of the college's performance groups.

After a beginning set from DJ Franny Unicorn, the stage was graced with the presence of Lift Every Voice, the Accents, Skidaiko, the Drastic Measures, Joanna Schubert, Matt Gaydar, the Dynamics and the debut performance of the Treblemakers, the college's new all-inclusive a capella group.

Each group performed two pieces and many of the a capella groups premiered new songs to the excitement of a full house.

Student bands MaryLeigh and the Fauves and Weekend Girlfriend closed the show to a dancing, engaged crowd.

The orderly rows of chairs were cleared out to create a dance floor and the crowd took advantage of the opportunity to dance the night away.

In addition, donations and supplies were collected at the door and a bake sale and raffle for items such as a Plum Dandy gift card and calendars were held.

Dinkelacker and Hickey took the stage between each act to explain that the money raised would be used to supply essentials such as clean water to the children of the orphanage.

Overall, a fantastic, fun-filled night was had by all to support a great cause and the concert was a success. More than $500 was raised, and the large box for supplies was filled completely.

Anyone hoping to support this cause still has time to donate. The student volunteers will have a donation box in Case and collect supplies. Any gently-used items or monetary donations can make a difference. A full list of items can be found on their Facebook page.

Letter: The problem is a lack of respect

Posted by Anonymous

After the "Food for Thought" posters, the community meetings, the teach-in hosted by the college administration and manifold articles in The Skidmore News about diversity, it is clear that the college is facing the breakdown of its attempts to create a stable, diverse environment.

Theories have come from every direction as to why the college's formula has not worked; students and faculty alike are trying to figure out what went wrong and how to fix it. This writer would like to pose a theory that he has not heard yet: the current problems on campus have their root in a lack of respect and good-will overall at Skidmore.

Recall the student-led community meeting that took place as a result of the "Food for Thought" posters. If you were in the room, something would've become clear to you as you hear the students speak: everyone present had been the target of some ridicule, extreme or mild, during their college career. A discussion that focused on prejudice against Skidmore's minority groups revealed that people of all statuses have dealt with malicious jokes, slander and hateful actions at this college. This is a problem that members of every group, from minorities to the majorities, have clearly experienced.

It is definitely regrettable that the recent bias incidents and diversity problems were what it took to make this problem apparent to us. In following the college's second strategic goal, the administration has taken various steps – like diversifying the student and faculty population – to simulate our world's diversity inside the campus's borders. But what Skidmore has failed to realize is that a diverse community without the core value of respect for others (especially for individuals with different backgrounds than our own) will not succeed. Indeed, it cannot.

What the recent diversity tensions have shown us is that the college community greatly lacks moral development. There is currently no emphasis on teaching students how to be honorable, upright and respectful individuals. Though the Skidmore administration teaches multiculturalism and diversity, it has sincerely failed at providing the lessons of compassion and tolerance where are co – if not pre – requisite. Because of the college's deficiency in instilling such values, Skidmore has turned into a place which one student who attended the meeting described as "very bitter."

No community can survive if there is not respect and good-will toward one's neighbor, least of all a diverse community where we may have little in common.

To repair the situation on campus, as it is imperative that we do, I challenge the college administration and the students to push for a greater emphasis on the moral values that have recently been neglected. We, the students, must realize that even the smallest remark of arrogance, hatred or disrespect has enough power to destroy the whole college, since at some point we will have to choose between kindness and hatred. We must also remember that our personal values will eventually shape the community, and if we push to be a kinder people, then we will build a more compassionate campus.

The administration must equally uphold these lessons. It is not enough to push for academic success, diversity, informed citizenship and independence of resources, the college's current strategic goals.

If we go to a college where values of respect and benevolence toward others are not in the forefront of our education, then we've already lost.

The writer of this letter is a member of the class of 2012, and asked to remain anonymous.

Teach-in confronts Compton's incident

Posted by Alex Brehm

At 4:30 p.m. on Feb. 24 more than 200 students and faculty members attended a teach-in organized to address the Dec. 2010 assault at Compton's restaurant and it's aftermath.

The event was held in the Spa and was organized by professor Winston Grady-Willis of the American studies department.

Several members of the college community spoke at the teach-in and presented various perspectives on the incident at Compton's Restaurant.

In late December, four students were arrested and charged with varying counts of assault after an incident at Compton's Restaurant in Saratoga Springs.

One student was charged with a hate crime, which was later dropped after the county District Attorney found the charge to be without substance.

Speakers discussed the history of racism in the U.S., presenting the idea that the hate crime charge in the Compton's incident was an example of racial prejudice and misunderstanding.

Janet Casey, a professor in the English department, began the teach-in with a description of anonymous blog posts and comments on the Internet, and the vitriolic nature they have taken. She noted specific comments on Food for Thought posters and Skidmore Unofficial.

Casey said that though students and professors might conclude that they cannot control other people's words, students could take responsibility for their own speech and ensure that it is part of a respectable dialogue.

Director of Student Diversity Programs Mariel Martin spoke about many issues that make students feel marginalized on campus, including issues of culture, language and accessibility. She also spoke about the challenges of navigating dominant and non-dominant groups on campus.

Mason Stokes, chair of the English department, spoke about the dilemma of acting without sufficient facts and information. In cases where facts must be withheld, he said, it is necessary to wait for better information, though such waiting can lead to a lack of community action.

Stokes said he could safely assume that police reports were not always true, and that young men of color and low socio-economic status cannot always be assured the same access to representation in the justice system as white, wealthier defendants.

The issue of ‘white flight' and ethnicity in urban areas was addressed next. Professor Jon Zibbell of the anthropology department said that unequal access to mortgages in the 1950s led racial minorities to be forced to live in high-density urban areas.

"What, do black folks just like cement? And white folks just like picket fences and single-family homes? No." Zibbell said.

Police treat people of different races differently when at the scene of a criminal investigation, Zibbell said, and the development of the suburbs, as well as behavior of police, could lead consumers of the media to be immediately skeptical of accounts of such events as the Compton's incident.

Guest speaker Gaspar Castillo, a defense attorney from Albany, spoke about the prejudices he witnesses when he works with defendants of different races.

Castillo said that when defending an African America man for a murder charge he first pointed the jury's attention to his client's race and urged them not to try him solely on the color of his skin. Castillo also spoke about his experiences growing up as a Latino man.

Castillo asked the audience some basic civil rights questions, leading to a tense moment when students in attendance were unable to describe the 1857 landmarks Supreme Court case Dred Scott v. Sandford that determined slaves were not citizens.

Theater lecturer Lisa Grady-Willis closed the teach-in. "What does it take to be visible, to be respected, to have a presence?" she asked.

Student-organized trip sends 30 to Planned Parenthood rally

Posted by Andrew Cantor

Background

Thirty students boarded a bus from Case Center on the morning of Feb. 26, traveled to New York City and joined 5,000 other activists to protest recent legislation that would cut funding for Planned Parenthood and its affiliates.

Planned Parenthood, in coalition with other reproductive rights and health organizations, coordinated "The Rally to Stand Up for Women's Health" in response to an amendment passed in the House Feb. 18 that would cut "Title X" funding for Planned Parenthood.

The Title X Family Planning program — or Public Law 91-572 — allocates federal funding for preventive health services, like education about sexually transmitted infections and screenings for breast and cervical cancers, but prohibits federal funding for abortions. In 2010, the federal government gave $363 million to Planned Parenthood, according to the organization's website.

The Title X program helps fund 97 percent of Planned Parenthood's operations, the majority of which are preventative health efforts. Abortions make up about three percent of the organization's efforts, according to its website. In this past year, Title X funding provided 360,492 STI tests, 67,957 breast exams and 70,490 pap tests to women at Planned Parenthood facilities in New York.

After the House approved the recent legislation with a vote of 240-185, sponsor Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., said, "It's morally wrong to take taxpayers' dollars of millions of pro-life Americans and use [them] to fund organizations that provide and promote abortion like Planned Parenthood of America."

The legislation will now go to the Senate for approval.

During the rally this past Saturday, Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY, made clear he would do whatever possible to prevent the Senate from passing the legislation.

"I come from the United States Senate and I bring you good news. These dangerous cuts that have passed the House are dead on arrival in the United States Senate," Schumer said. "And I speak for my colleague [Sen.] Kirsten Gillibrand [D-N.Y.] as well."

While it is unlikely that the Democrat-majority Senate will pass the legislation, students protested Saturday to draw local and national attention to women's rights and women's health.

 

 

Planning

Emily Zahn '11, a social work major, interns with Family Planning Advocates of New York State as part of her capstone project. She helped charter a bus for activists going to the New York rally from Albany, and later helped organize a bus from Skidmore.

"We coordinated a bus for people from Albany, but I also knew there were Skidmore students interested in going to the rally," Zahn said. "I know students at the school who have used Planned Parenthood services, so obviously the rally was appealing to them."

Sarah Rosenblatt '12, co-president of BARE — the self-identified Skidmore "sex publication" — found out about the rally from a guest speaker in a religion course taught by Mary Stange, professor of Gender Studies and Religion.

Stange invited Nancy Weber, a practicing pagan, to speak to her RE330 "Goddesses and Amazons" class. Weber's discussion with the class was relevant to its multifaceted study of female empowerment, and she explained her own values of community and activism. She also mentioned the upcoming rally in New York City.

Rosenblatt, inspired by Weber's talk, decided to gather a group of students passionate about the women's issues to attend the rally. Rosenblatt contacted Zahn to charter a bus directly from Skidmore to New York.

The chartered 56-seat coach bus from Skidmore to New York cost about $1600 dollars. Students paid only $10 dollars for a seat on the bus, and Family Planning of New York subsidized the rest of the cost.

 

 

In the Streets

The Rally to Stand Up for Women's Health drew about 5,000 supporters to Foley Square in downtown Manhattan.

The roughly two-hour midday event featured speeches by Schumer and Democratic Reps. Carolyn Malone, Yvete Clarke and Jerry Nadler of New York, as well as musical performances by The Mountain Goats and Nellie McKay.

Chris Weigl '11, one of only a few males from Skidmore who attended the rally, said he decided to attend because he heard Planned Parenthood was losing funding.

"I decided to go because reproductive health is important to everyone," Weigl said.

Most of the Skidmore students who attended agreed that the event was generally a success.

"The rally was so enthusiastic," Zahn said. "There was just an attitude of happiness and joy."

Rosenblatt expressed similar sentiment, noting in particular the diverse types of people that the event drew.

"It was great," Rosenblatt said. "It was a very active crowd… very diverse in terms of age, race, color and sexually."

Victoria Manganiello '12 was also struck by the types of people who were at the event.

"I think the speakers were powerful," Victoria Manganiello '12 said. "A pastor spoke in favor of Planned Parenthood and their efforts. Normally people equate anti-choice with Christianity… It was good hearing this wasn't necessarily true."

A few students thought event planners could have improved the rally with a more diverse speakers list.

"While it was good to hear a lot of politicians speak, I also don't feel that they're representative of the people who actually use Planned Parenthood's services," Rosenblatt said.

Victoria's sister, Lily Manganiello '14, also noted the overuse of politicians as speakers.

"I didn't necessarily relate to a lot of the speakers," Manganiello said. "Although it was good to hear the politicians speak, because they're the ones directly changing the law."

Students who attended the rally were clearly frustrated with legislation passed in the house, particularly the way they feel it misrepresents fact.

"I'm bothered that people are misinterpreting where Title X funds are going," the younger Manganiello said. "Our tax dollars aren't going to abortions… They're going to birth controls and other preventative measures."

Olivia Morrow '12 lamented the fact that she feels politicians formulate opinions on such matters in accordance with political allegiances.

"It's unfortunate now where politics have gotten to the point where being a Republican means being pro-life," Morrow said. "Politicians are voting on party lines on these very serious issues to women's health."

Zahn plans to continue to support women's health with a rally outside of U.S. Rep. Chris Gibson's, R-Kinderhook, office Friday afternoon on Broadway, in Saratoga Springs.

"We still need to put pressure on our legislators," she said. "We still need a lot of visibility."

Prof. Stange, who attended the rally, said she grew up thinking political action "could work," pointing to the Civil Rights Movement, the women's rights movement, the environmentalism movement and the Vietnam War protests as examples. But now, she said, "It seems almost [as if] change can sometimes seem impossible."

"But I think students here and elsewhere are starting to take to social change," she said.

PIRGs fight for cheaper books

Posted by Mariel Kennedy

According to College Board, the national average cost of textbooks at a four-year public college is $1,137.

The Student Public Interest Research Groups — self-described as "a national network of non-profit, non-partisan student advocacy groups — respond to the high and rising costs of textbooks with the creation of the Make Textbooks Affordable Junior Advocate Program. According to PIRGs' website, the program intends to "train and empower students to take action on campuses across the country."

PIRGs explains the program as "the first student-led marketing campaign of its kind and represents a major turning point in the movement for more affordable textbooks."

In addition to the amount of money the average student spends on textbooks, the site claims that prices have risen to more than quadruple the rate of inflation and that "publishers release frequent new editions to limit used books, conceal price information from faculty and bundle textbooks with ‘bells and whistles' to inflate costs."

To decrease the amount spent by students, PIRGs are pushing for a new form of textbooks called "open textbooks."

PIRGs define open textbooks as "college texts offered online under a license that allows free digital access and low-cost printing." Open textbooks are unlike "conventional e-books," as they can be found online for free and hard copies can be accessed at a rate of about $20 to $40.

Open textbooks are gaining popularity across the country. PIRGs state that making the switch to open textbooks allows professors to "save their students up to $20,000 per class" and "have the potential to reduce costs by up to 80 percent."

Despite that more than a thousand classes in the U.S. have made the switch to open textbooks, PIRGs state that a majority of professors have never heard of the books. Thus, the Junior Advocate Program was created.

Junior Advocates are currently creating and presenting campaigns that market open textbooks on their campuses. Methods used are similar to those used by big-budget publishing companies and include "one-on-one conversations, group presentations, online promotion and media outreach."

Rather than focusing on the availability of used books and book rentals, the Junior Advocate Program works "to change the dynamics of the textbooks market by challenging traditional publishing models."

Joanne Schwartzberg '12 is currently studying off-campus in the Washington Semester Program through American University. Part of her program is an internship, which she is fulfilling by becoming a Junior Advocate.

"Open source textbooks are important because they are the wave of the future. Everything is going to become digitalized eventually, including textbooks, and we should jump on the bandwagon now," Schwartzberg said.

PIRGs' main goal is not just to save students money, but to also send the message to publishing companies that "professors will stop using books if they get too expensive… [leaving companies] no choice but to lower their prices and make textbooks affordable."

Schwartzberg also feels that open textbooks will ultimately benefit the country. "Textbook affordability is a large way we can make higher education in general affordable for more people … It will lead to more success and a stronger workforce for America and who can argue with that," Schwartzberg said.

After a spring break trip to New York City to talk to faculty members at New York University and Columbia University, Schwartzberg will be bringing the message of open textbooks to the Skidmore campus.

"We're already paying $50,000 a year to go here; textbooks should not be what break our banks," Schwartzberg said.

PIRGs are campaigning for sustainable campuses, affordable higher education, truth about credit and more.

They also offer many internships and volunteer opportunities to interested students.

Lucy's Caf?? opens to mixed reviews

Posted by Max Siegelbaum

Lucy's Café, on the first floor of the Scribner Library, opened on Feb. 25 to mixed reviews from the campus.

The new café is located across from the circulation desk in the room that used to house the library's copy and fax machines.

Lucy's is designed in a similar fashion to the Burgess and Atrium cafés, with earth toned Formica plastic and glossy stained wood. Students, primarily upperclassmen, staff the café.

While bags of green mountain coffee line the walls, coffee is prepared from small capsules in a brand new Keurig single serving coffee dispenser. The café also offers assorted pastries, fruit, juice and bottled organic tea.

Students have expressed mixed opinions about the necessity and convenience of a café in the library.

"[The café is] awesome. I don't have to go outside to get coffee," Courtenay Jagel '11, said.

Nadia Arcese '11 said she believes the café has promise, but worries that it might lead to a crowded and noisy first floor.

Other students expressed concern about the café.

"[The café] sounds unnecessary and wasteful unless they bring something different than Burgess," Sarah Rosenblatt '12 said. She suggested that Lucy's might consider importing food from the local farmer's market.

Tommy Wagner '13 said the café is unnecessary and a waste of resources. "I don't mind walking an extra two minutes down a covered walkway to get my coffee. We already have 3 food establishments all in minutes of each other."

A post on the website Skidmore Unofficial pointed out another negative aspect of the café: coffee from Lucy's is more expensive per ounce than coffee at any other campus café.

"One Keurig K-Cup brews about 8 ounces of watery coffee and will set you back $1.25." says the Skidmore Unofficial post. A 12-ounce cup at Burgess, the Atrium, or the Spa is the same price.

Students also described the coffee at Lucy's as bland and watery.

Despite some negative response, a member of the Scribner Library staff, who declined to have her name published, said she is "cautiously optimistic" about the future of Lucy's.

Lucy's is open from 8 a.m. to noon Monday through Friday, and from 8 p.m. to midnight Sunday through Thursday.

Not your average deli sandwich

Posted by Erin Dillon

On a snowy Saratoga night, sometimes the best thing to do is eat a good sandwich, especially one made by the lovely folks at Legends Café.

Michael McQuatters and Christine Lloyd own Legends and have definitely succeeded in creating a hospitable restaurant where the customer is appreciated. The anything-but-basic menu items are named after Hollywood and sports legends. Top sellers include The Tiger, The Bradshaw and The Friends Salad.

Located at 102 Congress Street, the restaurant is a walk from the bus stop, but the food is well worth the journey. Legends is more than an average deli. The menu offers a variety of subs, wraps, sandwiches, soups and salads. Legends has recently introduced burgers and paninis to the menu, which have been a big hit.

Additionally, there are ever-changing soup and sub specials; special are listed on Legends' Facebook page.

McQuatters' emphasized Legends' use of fresh, local ingredients.

"What separates us from [most] places is that we make everything [ourselves]," McQuatters said. He explained that "We [Legends] don't deal with national food chains. You won't be eating chicken from Nebraska." That is, Legends uses fresh, never frozen, ingredients.

I certainly detected the freshness in my dinner. The Angelina Panini, made with mozzarella, spinach, roasted red peppers, tomatoes and a balsamic vinaigrette was very tasty and perfectly portioned. As a vegetarian, I appreciated Legends' extensive menu. Sure, they have sandwiches with heaping piles of three types of meat, but they also maintain an exciting selection for the vegetarians out there.

One great component of the menu is the Create Your Own Salad option, which completely allows customers to be in charge of their meal. You can choose from an array of lettuces, veggies, meats, dressings and other toppings. Legends is all about you.

Though the café itself appears plain, the service is genuine and the food delicious. Legends is all about convenience, and offer take-out and delivery options. In fact, delivery is 40 percent of sales.

The owners also pay special attention to the goings-on at Skidmore and anticipate events like Fun Day when delivery is usually in high demand. A sweet touch to your meal: Legends accepts your Skid Card.

Last Friday McQuatters brightened my day with this compliment to Skidmore: "Our best interactions are with Skidmore." Legends openly relies on the business that Skidmore brings. Unlike other restaurants on Broadway, Legends is busiest in the off-season, while school is in session.

Charlie Sheen wins hearts, blows minds: Ancient American Traditions

Posted by Brian Connor

Not in recent history has an episode of celebrity sensationalism struck so deeply at the underpinnings of the American cultural psyche. Charlie Sheen's wild drug and prostitute-riddled escapades are the latest product of our culture's celebrity mania. He went off the deep-end, TMZ and major news agencies tell us. And now he must pay. Our capitalist overlords who created him now demand that he submit himself to a public shaming, that he shrink into rehab and await exoneration.

Our culture builds up celebrities and destroys them, in an endless cycle of exploitation. Sheen, however, is attempting to break that cycle and reclaim his life from the capitalist puppet-masters of our society who are determined to dictate his destiny. And he's winning.

Charlie Sheen, after several news-making incidents of debauchery involving prostitutes and cocaine binges, has for the past few days been making the rounds on television shows preaching his newfound gospel of freedom. He has spoken erratically, at great length, about "waging a war" and "winning," bizarrely asserting his identity as a "Vatican assassin" with "tiger blood and Adonis DNA," as an "F-18, bro." But throughout his strange rants a theme emerges. Beneath his meandering wordplay is an indictment of our society and its judgments and a reclamation of his right to self-determine his own image and life.

Chris Hedges, known for his war correspondence in the Middle East, gave a lecture this past fall as a part of Rick Chrisman's "Theater of War in a House of Peace" lecture series. Hedges delivered an exposé of our current cultural and political predicament, in which celebrity worship serves as a glamorous façade for our twisted moral and economic ambitions, defining and justifying our "Empire of Illusion."

Michael Jackson, he argued, was the personification of our warped cultural values and priorities. "In celebrity culture we destroy what we worship. The commercial exploitation of Michael Jackson's death was orchestrated by the corporate forces that rendered Jackson insane," Hedges said. Sheen appears to be the next victim, a discredited celebrity whose fall from stardom is being exploited with equal attention and relish as his rise.

Sheen's "insanity," his incoherent declarations of selfdom, are ridiculed, endlessly parodied and mocked. Internet memes, celebrity gossip blogs and major news agencies are all given purpose in destroying him. His outlandish behavior is treated as equally important as foundation-shattering democratic uprisings in Northern Africa.

All the gears of our merciless media are fused into an unstoppable cultural monster that aspires to dictate his behavior, to judge and mock his every word, to reclaim control of his life, to rehabilitate him and reeducate him to the rules of celebrity and remind him that he belongs to us, that we created him and we can destroy him, that he is ours to judge and embrace and ridicule.

His highly personal rants are dismissed as insane by "authoritative and professional" media personalities. His oddly employed baseball analogies, bizarre proclamations of war and instantaneous recovery from drug addiction are detached from reality, we are told. Yet when seen in the broader context of this gross media carnival of human commoditization that is our consumer culture, Sheen's proclamations of war and assertions that he is "winning" appear utterly sane, utterly truthful.

Who are we, Sheen is brutally, confrontationally asking, who are the media, who are the celebrity rehab doctors, who are the "news" anchors on major networks, who are the producers of his films and television shows, who are the puppet-masters of our corporate society, to dictate how he should live his life?

Sheen is refusing to submit to the cycle of use and abuse, the commoditization of his humanity, which his corporate bosses are imposing upon him. There is something inspirational about his resistance to his detractors, his "winning" attitude.

Sheen's outspokenness in the face of imminent and imposed cultural humiliation and exploitation is reminiscent of Howard Beale's, the prophetic news anchor in Sidney Lumet's 1976 film Network. A low-level newscaster, Beale begins to "lose his mind." He goes on a rant on live TV and decries the dehumanizing consumerism of modern life epitomized and perpetuated by network television, in which products and wealth are made the balm for existential fear and the executors of happiness. He ends his rant with the words "I'm a human being, goddammit! My life has value!" and urges his viewers to declare that "I'm mad as hell, and I'm not going to take it anymore!" His mantra of resistance ultimately becomes a meaningless commercial jingle, a parody of its former meaning, as the powers he means to confront ultimately commoditize his radicalism and then destroy him.

In the climactic scene of the film, Beale is confronted by Arthur Jensen, the uppermost corporate executive, who speaks with a divine aura of authority an omniscience, telling Beale, "you get up on your little 21 inch screen and howl about America and democracy. There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and ITT and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, Union Carbide and Exxon … The world is a college of corporations … one vast and ecumenical holding company in which all men will hold a share of stock, all necessities provided, all anxieties tranquilized, all boredom amused." Beale, realizing the futility of combating such a pernicious and entrenched capitalist system, abandons his radicalism and complies with the corporate will.

If the powers-that-be have their way, Sheen's story will be turned into a faux-moralistic one. They will ruin him, destroy him and essentially present his life as a model of what not to do. In a culture that has been hijacked to worship celebrities, to believe that celebrity is the one true trophy of success, Sheen's story will be presented as a case of a fallen star, a washed up celebrity. What he really did was challenge the corporately sponsored rule of law that we are all instructed to abide by.

His "winning" mantra, what commentators would have us believe is the pathetic delusions of an over the hill Hollywood actor, actually makes sense in the vicious system of oppressive delusion in which we all exist. He is "winning" the war over his soul, resisting submission to the forces that shape

Hedges writes that, "the fame of celebrities masks the identities of those who possess true power — corporations and the oligarchic elite … The fantasy of celebrity culture is not designed simply to entertain. It is designed to drain us emotionally, confuse us about our identity, make us blame ourselves for our predicament, condition us to chase illusions of fame and happiness and keep us from fighting back."

Politicians inspire us with fear and hatred for one another to advance corporate agendas. Giant corporations seek to encroach upon and determine our lives, keep us entertained as our natural environment is pillaged and our working class is economically raped. Their news organs instill us with fear, and their advertising teaches us that buying their products and living according to their rules is the only way to avoid public shame and ensure wealth, celebrity and happiness. Facebook launches us into cyber-reality in which we can determine our appearance down to the slightest minutiae, meticulously calculate how we are presented to the people around us, and thereby shirk meaningful social interaction. The battle for our souls is taking place each and everyday. Charlie Sheen is winning. What are you doing about it?

Skidstyle: What are they wearing?

Posted by Faith Nicholas

A conservative striped skirt topped with an embellished leather jacket. A proper sweater, khakis and combed hair offset by rugged boots. A sporty anorak covers a floral dress.

Are these designer fashions currently being sent down the runway? No. These are typical outfits seen on Skidmore's campus.

Take any model off the runways of the fall 2011 ready-to-wear shows in New York and he or she would fit perfectly into the Skidmore style world. Though the shows covered a range of different styles from classic to rugged to bohemian, the majority of shows this season were eclectic.

Patterns weighed heavily in the collections of Marc Jacobs and Proenza Schouler, while Libertine played with clashing prints and haphazard silhouettes. Thakoon Panichgul of Thakoon received inspiration from the costumes of Versailles and the clothes of Kenyan tribes.

Similarly an eclectic look represents the overall ‘Skidstyle.'

At Skidmore, style is about personal expression rather than just fashion.

A Sept. 16, 2010 post from the blog of the school's style photographer, the Skidtorialist, reads, "And what is fall fashion? Who the eff cares. With a little bit of aplomb, you can pull off anything."

Confidence pulls an assorted look together, whether the look is "fashionable," or not.

Harvesting a personal style is more important than being a slave of designer-declared fashion.

Outfits often pull from a range of inspirations. Wardrobes consist of items that do not ‘match' but still look good together.

Recycling clothes is popular on campus. Some pieces are bought at thrift stores, while some have been passed down from parents, relatives or friends. Almost all secondhand pieces tell a story.

Clothing swaps have been held by the Skidtorialist and the Environmental Action Club while the Freecycle table in Case Center allows students to leave unwanted clothing or pick up some ‘new' items.

An element of humor also runs through the student style, as can be seen in the ubiquitous knit hat resembling a lion, zebra or other animal.

Students pull from movies, television and the occasional runway show as well.

Looks appear unintentionally stylish and fresh.

Gina Doherty ‘14, said, "There is a definite vibe to clothing here, but it is hard to define. People do not look like they try too hard."

Some disagree with this statement. Tera Johnson ‘14, said Skidmore style can be split into three styles – the student ‘straight out of an Urban Outfitters catalog,' the one ready to go hiking after class and the jock. Male students spoken to believe some girls "dress like grandmothers."

While all these assumptions may be true in one way or another, one cannot deny that there are a wide variety of looks and styles on campus.

At its core Skidmore does not have one definitive style. Rather, it is a mix of elements that reflect personalities, interests, backgrounds and luck. Not everyone is blessed with the gift of shopping.

Skidmore students appear to be ahead of the curve fashion-wise. The fall runways were laden with models in Skidmore-esque outfits, which is admittedly pretty cool.

What is even cooler is that Skidmore students could care less whether they are in vogue. They are just dressing in what they like and what will keep them the warmest.

Alumnus lecturer helps hook-ups and nonprofits

Posted by Alex Brehm

Few students know about it but the once-popular internet service for Skidmore students, Hookup (student.skidmore.edu/hookup), is still available to match up Skidmore students to their secret admirers.

After logging in to the website, students can enter the usernames of students in they are romantically interested in. If the interest has done the same to them, Hookup will send both students a message telling them that they have been matched.

The website allows students to find out about their crushes without risking rejection.

Hookup was designed by Andrew Cencini '01, a computer science and classics alumnus who has returned for a semester to lecture in the computer science department.

"It's funny that it's called Hookup, actually, because the site was designed as a way to avoid the hookup culture on campus," Cencini said. "It's meant to connect students romantically."

Cencini is currently teaching an introductory computer science course, as well as "Cloud Computing and Distributed Systems," a class about large-scale computer services such as Google, Facebook, BitTorrent and other large computer networks.

Before teaching at the college, Cencini ran his own software development business, designing software for managing data centers. Before his business, Cencini worked at Microsoft, producing structural programming for the Internet search engine Bing.

While he was a student, Cencini took on a number of other programming projects, such as designing the online SGA voting system.

"Before that, it was all paper ballots," he said. "You'd line up in the Dining Hall to vote."

Cencini also designed the Student Announcements email program. His name is visible at the bottom of the Announcements website along with the names of other students who have updated the service since he graduated.

Cencini is currently working on a new project called Technology 4 Good. He is collaborating with other programmers in the Saratoga area to design technological tools for nonprofit and charitable organizations.

One of the group's plans is to start a website providing used goods to nonprofits. Instead of throwing out old equipment, such as a lawn mower or a computer, homes and businesses could post the good to the website, allowing a local nonproft to use it.

"It's like the Freecycle table in Case Center," Cencini said.

Like Hookup, Cencini hopes that Technology 4 Good serves to connect people — in this case through social and environmental justice rather than romance.

Cencini is looking for interested students to help out in the projects and gain experience in programming and working with charities.

Kings of Limbs' is worth a listen: Let's Talk About Rock

Posted by Eli Cohen

On Feb. 18, revolutionary alt-rock band Radiohead released its eighth studio album, "The King of Limbs," and received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics all over the world.

The album was originally scheduled for a Feb. 19 release, but for reasons unknown the band decided to push the drop date forward one day.

The first reactions from many Radiohead fans were uniform. A general satisfaction seemed to be the consensus among fans on campus.

The eight-track album, which wraps up at 37 minutes of total playtime, has already provoked a plethora of wide-ranging conspiracy theories, as only Radiohead has been able to do for years now.

One of the only musicians better at inspiring conspiracy theories is Robert Johnson, the man notorious for allegedly selling his soul to the devil at the Crossroads in exchange for his supernatural guitar-playing ability.

Another musical group that, like Radiohead, rivaled its ability to prompt such theories was The Beatles, the band that managed to convince an entire generation that its bassist, Sir Paul McCartney, was dead.

There are two most agreed-upon (and rational) theories revolving around "King of Limbs": it was either released with the intent that there would be a follow-up album released not far in the future, or that it was released as a remix album.

What exactly is a remix album? This is a good question, especially in the era of dubstep and hip-hop remixes.

No one is suggesting that Kanye is going to be sampling this album. This conspiracy theory directly correlates with another Radiohead conspiracy: the "01-10" theory, which combines their albums "OK, Computer" and "In Rainbows."

The first song from "OK, Computer" is followed by the first song on "In Rainbows" and this pattern continues throughout both albums.

But enough about conspiracies. Let's get to the actual music. Despite the praise given in critics' reviews, many listeners have ended up unimpressed by the album.

Now, there is no way to claim that a band as talented and groundbreaking as Radiohead released a bad album, and one who would say such a thing would be isolated from the world of music.

However, "Kings of Limbs" is a far cry from Radiohead's previous works.

"Kings of Limbs" does not really hit its stride until "Lotus Flower," the album's fifth track that falls past the halfway point of the album.

The opening song, "Bloom," as well as "Feral" are interesting, but they seem almost a little too experimental, although some fans may not agree.

From "Lotus Flower" on, the songs begin to take more of a clear shape, and the album becomes an absolute delight to listen to.

This is especially true for "Codex," the track directly following "Lotus Flower", and "Seperator," the dramatic conclusion to the album.

Radiohead fans will tell anyone who will listen that any of their albums is absolutely worth having, and "King of Limbs" is no exception.

Keeping that in mind, fans should not build this album past its potential. It is a without a doubt a great album, but not one of Radiohead's best.

In the end, whether listeners will enjoy this album depends on how willing they will be to get past the first couple of rough patches. If so, they will find the album intensely gratifying to listen to.

Eli Cohen is a sophomore Music major from Middlebury, Vt.

Editorial: Students must look beyond the number

Posted by the Editorial Board

Our college is 41. According to "U.S. News and World Report," this number encompasses everything that prospective students need to know about the campus we call home. From that, applicants should be able to understand our professors' engagement, our classes' difficulty and the overall value of a diploma with "Skidmore College" stamped across the top.

The magazine heads its list of college rankings with a disingenuous disclaimer: "These rankings provide one tool for selecting a college." But for many families, the "U.S. News and World Report" list stands as an authoritative guide for where to spend tuition dollars. Whether it acts as a one-stop mailing list for where to ship off a Common Application, or just a quiet source of doubt for high school seniors already second-guessing their own ideas of where they might be happy, the list's influence on students' college search is poisonous and pervasive.

Criticisms of the rankings' methodology and undue influence have been around almost since the magazine initially published its first Best Colleges issue in 1983. Outlets from the "San Francisco Chronicle" to "The New Yorker" have published condemnations of the list, claiming it maintains a status quo of high-endowment colleges dominating the top spots, leaving unrecognized the forward momentum of other schools repeatedly relegated to the middle of the pack.

No one means to denigrate the comprehensive research conducted by "U.S. News and World Report" every year. The data collected is significant: reputation among educators, class sizes and acceptance rates should, without question, play an influential role in students' assessment of potential colleges. But by combining these varied factors under one monolithic heading, "The Best," the magazine suggests that picking a college should be literally as simple as 1-2-3.

"U.S. News and World Report" might do better by its readership by promoting separate lists for each of the factors that now play a fractional role in a college's overall ranking: "Schools with the Smallest Class Sizes," "Schools Highest-Rated Among College Presidents," "Schools with the Greatest Financial Resources." By allowing students to mix and match among several lists, rather than allowing one list to overshadow specific criteria, the magazine would encourage more applicants to think critically about the college qualities most important to them.

As much flak as "The Princeton Review" deserves for its unabashedly unscientific methods for categorizing schools, it gets some of the college application process right. The website gained attention for rankings reflecting specific criteria important to students: from "Great College Towns" to "Most Politically Active Students," the review guide makes sure that prospective students know exactly what qualities are being ranked when they see numbers lined up on a page. These lists' popularity shows that students don't just want to be told what school is "the best" – they want to find out what school is right for them.

We appreciate that our college understands prospective students' difficulties in finding the college best-suited for their needs and that they remain sensitive to how the "U.S. News and World Report" list is ill-suited to helping students through that process. In 2007, President Glotzbach condemned the magazine's rankings for misleading students, going on to pledge that Skidmore would refuse to participate in the "U.S. News and World Report" reputational surveys that play a significant role in the formation of the "Best Colleges." The college is also notable in the absence of those rankings appearing in the college's promotional material, in a deliberate choice that we applaud.

Glotzbach understands, just as any student who has endured the college process does, that deciding where to attend college is a difficult process, one made no easier by the misleading numbers game of "U.S. News and World Report." As we pass prospective students visiting the campus this spring, we empathize with the challenges they face. Regardless of whether potential applicants like what they see at our college, we hope they see Skidmore's particular strengths and opportunities – ones that can't be enumerated.